A possible mechanism of action of ELD is to reduce the number of

A possible mechanism of action of ELD is to reduce the number of pores opening through the endocortical surface, thereby maintaining cortical thickness and increasing cortical density. ALF treatment, on the other hand, failed to block the resorption of trabeculated endocortical bone, resulting in an expansion of the trabecular

bone marrow cavity, decreased trabecular BMD, reduced cortical thickness, and increased cortical density. As a result of the ELD-specific effect on the endocortical surface, it is conceivable that ELD was more effective in increasing HSP inhibitor cortical bone mass than ALF. This observation is supported by the significantly higher reduction of bone resorption biomarkers observed with ELD treatment than with ALF treatment

(data not shown). Regarding the increased cortical perimeter in both the ALF and ELD groups, it is difficult to determine whether this simply reflects the age-related increase in periosteal apposition or whether the drugs this website in fact had some positive effect in extending bone perimeter. A recent QCT study on 2 years’ treatment with teriparatide [18] failed to reveal increases in total CSA or periosteal apposition. Although direct comparison is not feasible, given the difference in the observation period (2 versus 3 years) and presumably also in the threshold value to define the cortical bone, the significant increases in cortical perimeter after 3 years’ treatment with ELD as well as ALF may imply that ELD and ALF have the potential Isotretinoin to stimulate bone apposition at the periosteal surface. Along with these changes in the 3D geometry of the femoral

neck, ELD, but not ALF, improved biomechanical properties, specifically CSMI and SM. In a previous study [26] we compared the features of the femoral neck geometry in patients with hip or trochanteric fractures with their controls; patients with femoral neck fracture had a significantly longer HAL, lower CSMI, and higher BR, while those with trochanteric fracture had a smaller cortical CSA of the femoral neck. In view of the present findings that ELD increases CSMI and perhaps cortical CSA as well, ELD is expected to have the potential to reduce the risk of both femoral neck and trochanteric fractures. ALF and ELD failed to decrease BR. BR is a secondary parameter calculated by the average distance to the center of mass divided by average cortical thickness, and it is employed as a means to estimate the stability of the cortex in thin-walled regions subject to bending. Our previous study [26], in which BR was calculated according to the same formula, demonstrated that the BR in patients with hip fracture (12.22 ± 1.69) was higher than that in the control group (8.32 ± 2.13). In the present study, the percentage increase in BR during the 3-year follow-up was smaller in the ELD group (0.48%/year; 8.92 ± 2.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>