An example of a process generating a visuo-spatial fractal is depicted in Fig. 2. Here, a simple recursive rule adds a triad of smaller hexagons around each bigger hexagon. Since the relations between successive hierarchical levels are kept constant, individuals who are able to generate mental representations of recursion can make inferences about new (previously absent) hierarchical levels (Martins, 2012). This is the principle that we use in our investigation

(For more details, see Appendix A). Our goal was to investigate how the ability to represent hierarchical self-similarity develops in the visual domain, and how this ability can be predicted by individual differences in intelligence, grammar comprehension KU57788 and general visual processing. The ability to represent hierarchical self-similarity has been empirically tested in the syntactic domain and in the visual domain (Martins and Fitch, 2012 and Roeper, 2007). However, the developmental aspects of this ability have only been investigated in language (Roeper, 2011). In the next sections we briefly review what is currently known, and why it is important to extend this analysis to the visual-spatial domain. Within the domain of language, recursion seems to be universally used (Reboul, 2012), and although

rare in common speech (Laury & Ono, 2010), most language users are likely to have generated recursive sentences (for instance, compound nouns such as “[[[student] film]] committee]”). The widespread use of recursion in syntax has lead to the influential hypothesis that recursion would be part of a computational module specific MK-2206 purchase to language (Hauser et al., 2002). In its strongest version, the thesis ‘minimalist program’ postulates recursion as the central operation of most syntactic processes (Chomsky, 2010).

Within this theory, the usage of recursion in other domains would be dependent on the activation of linguistic resources. It is thus essential to empirically investigate the ability to acquire recursion HA-1077 nmr in non-linguistic domains and examine its relation to linguistic capacity. The development of recursion remains controversial. In English, children as young as 7-years-old are able to generate novel recursive structures, despite being exposed to a very limited recursive input (Berwick et al., 2011 and Roeper, 2009). They can also discriminate well-formed recursive constructions at the age of 3 (Alegre & Gordon, 1996). This has been taken as evidence that children are able to represent recursion a priori. Studies concerning the processing of child directed speech suggest that the presence of recursive rules as Bayesian priors better explain the acquisition of language than priors without recursion ( Perfors, Tenenbaum, Gibson, & Regier, 2010). Bayesian priors can be understood as analogous to a priori expectations that bias individuals to interpret stimuli in a certain way.