Another showed that when rats were required to hold down a lever

Another showed that when rats were required to hold down a lever until cued, one-third of dorsal mPFC cells HCS assay were significantly modulated during the delay (Narayanan and Laubach, 2006). Further, half of these were predictive of errors (i.e., premature release). A follow-up study showed that one-fifth of dorsal mPFC neurons respond differently after error trials and maintain this activity into the next trial (Narayanan and Laubach, 2008). Hence, mPFC cells exhibit properties consistent with short-term maintenance of memory for action and errors. There is

also evidence that mPFC plays a role in memory spanning minutes to hours, but only in certain circumstances. In general, forming a short-term memory for locations, odors, or objects does not require the mPFC (Birrell and Brown, 2000; Ennaceur et al., 1997; Seamans et al., 1995). For example, rodents with mPFC inactivation show normal performance in free foraging in

an eight-arm maze (Seamans et al., 1995). However, the task does become mPFC dependent if run as a spatial “win-shift” task (Seamans et al., 1995). In this variant, rats are initially rewarded on four arms and, CB-839 after a delay of 30 min, are tested for their ability to locate the previously nonrewarded arms. Surprisingly, the role of mPFC is limited to the retrieval phase; inactivation of the mPFC before training or the delay has no effect on test performance (Floresco et al., 1997; Seamans et al., 1995). Short-term memory for rewarded odors depends on mPFC when either a large number of odors must be remembered or odor associations must be acquired via social interaction (Boix-Trelis et al., 2007). In one example, rats with mPFC lesions were impaired when required to remember 10 sample odors over a 10 min delay (Farovik et al., 2008).

In comparison, short-term memory for objects, tested via novel object preference, does not require the mPFC (Ennaceur et al., 1997). To our knowledge, no within-session object-recognition task has shown mPFC Dipeptidyl peptidase dependence. Given the prominent role of the hippocampus in memory, it is no surprise that the hippocampus and mPFC are anatomically related. Compared to other cortical areas, projections from the ventral half of the hippocampus and subiculum to mPFC are particularly strong (Cenquizca and Swanson, 2007; Jay and Witter, 1991). The pathway is unidirectional but may be reciprocated via a bisynaptic route through the nucleus reunions or lateral entorhinal cortex (see Figure 3; Burwell and Amaral, 1998; Vertes et al., 2007). The evidence supports two possible roles for the hippocampal input to mPFC: to provide context or to enable rapid associative learning. The ability of the hippocampus to encode spatial location via “place fields” is well known (Wilson and McNaughton, 1993). However, as one moves along the septal (dorsal)—temporal (ventral) axis, place fields become progressively larger (Jung et al., 1994).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>