The interaction of Agent codability with Time bin shows that the difference in fixations to the “easy” and “hard” agents increased over time. As in Experiment 1, the interaction of Event codability with Time bin shows that speakers directed their gaze to the subject character more rapidly in “easy” events than “hard” events. Fixations between 1000 and 2200 ms. Speakers began looking away from the agent approximately 1000 ms after picture onset and switched their gaze to the patient approximately 1 s later (around speech

onset). At 1000–1200 ms, speakers were generally less likely to fixate “easy” agents than “hard” agents, and more likely to fixate agents in “easy” events than “hard” events; the two factors interacted this website in the by-participant analysis ( Table 5c). There was no three-way interaction Palbociclib with Time bin, indicating that this difference persisted across the entire time window. As a result, speakers also shifted their gaze to the patient most quickly in “easy” events with “easy” agents. Importantly, the strongest predictor of the timing of the gaze shift from agents to patients was Event codability: speakers looked to the patient earlier in “easier” events than “harder” events (an interaction of Event codability with Time bin). Consistent with hierarchical incrementality, this result suggests that speakers were able to begin adding the second character to the sentence earlier in items where

the event gist was easier to encode. Fixations between 0 and 400 ms. Fig. 4c and d shows the timecourse of formulation for items with “easier” and “harder” agents across Prime conditions. Again, speakers were more likely to fixate “easy” agents than “harder” agents across the entire time window: the effect

of Agent codability was reliable in the 0–200 ms time www.selleck.co.jp/products/AP24534.html bin (main effect of Agent codability in Table 6a) and was somewhat larger in the 200–400 ms time bin (an interaction of Agent codability with Time was observed in the by-item analysis). As predicted by hierarchical incrementality, early fixations to the agent were influenced by structural priming. Speakers directed fewer fixations to the agent after active primes than after other primes at 0–200 ms (neutral and passive primes; the first contrast for Prime condition in Table 6a); there was no interaction with Time bin, indicating that this difference persisted into the 200–400 ms time bin. The distribution of agent-directed fixations did not differ after neutral and passive primes (the second contrast for Prime condition). The priming effect also did not vary systematically with properties of the agent (no interaction with Agent codability). Fixations between 400 and 1000 ms. Having shifted their attention away from “easy” agents by 400 ms, speakers were less likely to fixate “easy” agents than “hard” agents at 400–600 ms (a main effect of Agent codability; Table 6b).