The only change to the method which we used for examining the pos

The only change to the method which we used for examining the posture effects within each separate experiment was that the analysis was now based on independent-samples Ku-0059436 nmr t-tests which compared the Posture (Uncrossed-hands ‘UnX’ and Crossed-hands ‘X’) × Hemisphere (Contralateral ‘Con’ and Ipsilateral ‘Ipsi’) contrast waveforms observed in Experiment 1 vs. Experiment 2; such t-tests equate to the three-way interaction between Experiment,

Posture and Hemisphere. Figure 6 shows the time course of this three-way interaction according to the specific subtractive contrast: Positive values of this contrast occur when posture effects are relatively more contralaterally distributed in Experiment 1 and relatively more ipsilaterally distributed in Experiment 2. The vertical dashed line in Fig. 6 shows the onset of the significant interval. Thus, a significant effect of sight of the limbs (the variable manipulated between the two experiments) on the laterality of postural remapping started at 152 ms and was observed until the end of the interval Selleck RO4929097 tested, i.e. 200 ms (a sequence of consecutive

significant t-tests, all P < 0.05, over 38 ms in length was deemed significant by our Monte Carlo simulation). The mean first-order autocorrelation at lag 1 (estimated in our data, and used for our Monte Carlo simulations) was 0.97 for this analysis. This interaction reflects the different hemispheric distribution of postural effects observed in the two experiments reported above, and confirms that when participants have sight of the hands the first effect of posture on the SEP is observed over contralateral sites (Exp. 1), whereas when participants do not have sight of their hands the first effect of posture is observed over ipsilateral sites (Exp. 2). Keeping track of the layout of Aspartate one’s body and limbs is

of central importance, not just to guide action, but also in making sense of the multisensory environment (see Holmes & Spence, 2004; Bremner et al., 2008). Without processes of remapping across changes in body posture (i.e. processes which take account of movements of the limbs, the head or even the eyes in their sockets; see Pöppel, 1973), we would be hard-pressed to comprehend the spatial correspondences between stimuli which arise from the same objects, but which arrive to the brain through different sensory channels. Given the central importance of processes of postural remapping in sensory spatial representation, it is crucial to determine how and when these processes occur in the brain. To address these questions, the current study investigated how changes in body posture modulate the electrophysiological time course of somatosensory spatial processing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>