2c). This region can also be seen at the level of individual participants in Fig. 3. As an additional test of our results, we defined integrative regions using one half of the data, which highlighted clusters in the right and left posterior superior temporal gyrus/sulcus (pSTG/STS; see Table 5a). Within each of

these clusters, we then tested to see whether people-selectivity – as defined using the other half of the data – was significant. Within the left pSTS, this contrast was not significant (t = −.46, p = .675); however, within the right pSTS this elicited a significant effect (t = 3.06, p < .002). This appears to confirm our initial finding that this particular cluster in the right pSTS is both people-selective ERK phosphorylation and integrative. Regions which responded to both visual and auditory information, as compared to baseline, consisted of the bilateral STG, Epigenetics inhibitor and bilateral inferior frontal gyri (Table 4c/Fig. 2d). Note

that whereas the ‘heteromodality’ criterion does not make any assumption on what should be the response to the AV condition, a large part of the right pSTS also followed the ‘max rule’. People-selective heteromodal regions, i.e., regions that responded significantly to both auditory and visual stimuli and that preferred social stimuli in both modalities, extended anteriorly to a large part of the STG/STS, and also activated the bilateral IFG (Table 4d/Fig. 2e). These regions can also be seen at the level of individual participants in Fig. 3. Similarly to the previous analysis, we defined heteromodal regions using one half of the data, which highlighted clusters in the right and left pSTG/STS; see Table 5b. Within each of these clusters, we then tested to see whether PI-1840 people-selectivity – as defined using the other half of the data – was significant. Within the left pSTS, this contrast was not significant (t = −.15, p = .56); however, within the right pSTS this elicited a significant effect (t = 2.96, p < .002). The aim of this study was to examine the neural correlates of people-selectivity (i.e., regions that preferred face and voice information, regardless

of condition), audiovisual integration (i.e., a significantly stronger response to audiovisual as compared to unimodal stimuli), and ‘heteromodality’ (i.e., a significant response to both vision and audition), specifically within the pSTS. Participants were scanned during an ‘audiovisual localiser’ during which they passively viewed a series of audiovisual, visual and auditory stimuli of either people or objects; responses to each specific condition were compared and contrasted. Using a single dataset and ecological stimuli – dynamic movies of faces and voices – our results not only confirm the multisensory nature of the pSTS, but also that areas of this structure selectively process person-related information irrespective of the sensory modality.