In the present study, the eGFR slope was less in the older group

In the present study, the eGFR slope was less in the older group than younger group (Table 3), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.154). In addition, there was no significant relationship between age and eGFR slope (Fig. 2a). Both the present

and CRISP AZD4547 molecular weight study [3] suggest that the eGFR slope is not significantly affected by age, at least after adolescence. The MDRD equation for estimating GFR is widely used [8–10] but its accuracy was recently reported to be 83% in ADPKD patients [21]. Renal function changes are qualitatively reflected by the 1/Cr slope in individual subjects, because individual body muscle volume and hydration status are relatively stable in most patients, at least for relatively short periods of a few years. In the present study, the 1/Cr slope was analyzed in addition to the eGFR

slope and the results were qualitatively similar in both analyses (Tables 2, 3; Figs. 3, 4). In 5 of 36 patients followed for more than 5 years, renal disease progression accelerated during observation (Fig. 4). This acceleration did not seem to be related to age or eGFR level, but presumably to individually different causes, including infection, hematuria, obstruction by urolithiasis or other events. If the acceleration of renal disease progression is due to the end of the renal compensation mechanism, the terminal points of the compensation mechanism might be heterogeneous among ADPKD patients. In relatively younger adult (29.9 ± 11.4 years) patients whose renal function was retained 4SC-202 datasheet (CKD

stage 1 in Table 2), the eGFR slope was already negative. In the majority of patients with initially measured eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, the eGFR slope was negative, as shown in Fig. 2b. These results suggest that the renal compensation mechanism might terminate in the second decade of life in most patients with ADPKD. A recent study which examined the detailed renal functions see more of young ADPKD patients showed abnormal kidney function even in the younger generation [4]. In a quartile of the younger age group (27 ± 5 years) in that study, GFR decreased but was statistically not different from that of the normal healthy controls. Even in these younger age group patients, effective renal plasma flow sharply decreased. Patients with CKD stage 1 (Table 2) in the present study correspond to quartile 1 group patients in that study [4], because age (29.9 ± 11.4 vs 27 ± 5 years) and eGFR (113.8 ± 25.9 ml/min/1.73 m2) in the present study and GFR measured by SB-715992 supplier iothalamate clearance (117 ± 32 ml/min) were not statistically different. The present study shows a negative eGFR slope and the study [4] showed decreased renal plasma flow in similar younger adult patients who maintained apparently normal GFR. Initially measured eGFR in relation to age in hypertensive patients was lower than that in normotensive patients, and the present results indicated that differences in eGFR between the two groups had already occurred before age 36 (Fig. 5a; Table 4).

Comments are closed.