No significant statistical differences between the risk of perfor

No significant statistical differences QNZ between the risk of perforation and the presence of co morbid diseases were found (Table 1). Regarding the time delay for treatment and as shown in Table 2, patients in the perforated group had a significantly longer Pre-hospital time delay than those in the

nonperforated group (79.6 h and 47.3 h respectively) with <0.0001 p-value. At the same time, the table did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups in regard to In-hospital delay (p-value 0.7923) Compound C datasheet (Table 2). Table 2 Delay in surgical intervention and post operative mean hospital stay Variable Perforated Non perforated P-value n= (87) n= (127) Mean delay in surgical treatment       Pre hospital delay 79.6 ± 62.4 hr 47.3 ± 43.7 hr < 0.0001* Hospital delay 19.2 ± 10.3 hr 18.7 ± 15.5 hr 0.7923 Post op hosp stay 7.4 ± 6.3 days 4.2 ± 3.1 days <0.0001* *The result is significant.

Regarding the Selleck Small molecule library clinical presentation, all patients were complaining of abdominal pain. However, the typical migratory pain that starts around the umbilicus and shifts later to the right lower abdomen was described only by 101 (47%) patients, 75 (59%) patients in the nonperforated and 26 (30%) in the perforated group. Anorexia was present in 74% of all patients but it could not differentiate perforated from nonperforated groups. Nausea and vomiting were present in 57% of the patients and were more significantly found Montelukast Sodium in the non perforated group (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison between perforated and nonperforated groups in regard to clinical picture Variables Total Perforated Non perforated P-value n=214 (100%) n= 87 (41%) n= 127 (59%) Migrating pain 101 (47) 26 (30) 75 (59) <0.0001* Anorexia 150 (70) 64 (74) 86 (68) 0.3588 Nausea & vomiting 122 (57) 37 (43) 85 (67) 0.0004* Tender right lower abdomen 180 (84) 65 (75) 115 (91) 0.0018* Rebound tenderness 160 (75) 70 (80) 90 (71) 0.1125 Fever > 38°C 87 (41) 44 (51) 43 (34) 0.0145* WBC count 143 (63) 62 (71) 72 (57) 0.0304* WBC shift to left 159 (74) 82(94) 77 (61) <0.0001* *The result is significant. Of all patients, 41% were febrile at presentation (>38°C). Fever was seen more in the perforated group of patients (51%-34%). Localized tenderness in the right lower abdomen was present in 84% of all patients with 91% in the nonperforated compared to 75% in the perforated group. Although rebound tenderness was found in 75% of patients, it did not differentiate between both groups (Table 3).

Comments are closed.