The HII infants included in our study suffered mild-to-moderate severity of illness as evidenced by Sarnat stage ranging from I–II. Additional information on severity of illness for the HII group, including number of subjects who required therapeutic hypothermia and/or suffered seizures, 1-min and 5-min Apgar scores and initial blood pH, is detailed in Table 1. Exclusion criteria were any chronic fetal or infant factors such as IUGR, maternal
learn more drug use, maternal diabetes, metabolic disorder, congenital malformations, or severe quadriplegia or significant abnormality in vision or eye movements. Typically developing participants were recruited from the Research Participant Registry of the Laboratories BIBW2992 mw of Cognitive Neuroscience at Boston Children’s Hospital. Hypoxic-ischemic injury and CON participants were included in the final sample if they had sufficient data from either the eye-tracking or the ERP paradigm. Four
infants (3 CON and 1 HII) were excluded because they missed their Day 2 appointment (and therefore had neither Day 2 eye-tracking nor ERP data to analyze). An additional 21 infants were excluded (17 CON and four HII) because they did not meet criteria for inclusion in the eye-tracking analysis (criteria described under data analysis—visual paired comparison) and they did not provide the minimum number of artifact-free trials in the ERP task. Further, two HII infants were excluded from subsequent analyses due to severe motor and visual impairment. Project approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Boston Children’s Hospital, and informed consent was obtained by the parents of each infant participant. The CON and HII groups were matched on both age (t(32) = .27, p = .79, d = 0.14) and socioeconomic status, as estimated by parental income (t(28) = .42, p = .68, d = 0.16). Mirabegron Additionally, the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (Mullen, 1995) was administered to assess
cognitive ability. An early learning composite score (ELC) was calculated for each participant based on performance across four subscales: Visual reception, fine motor, receptive language, and expressive language. No difference was found between HII and CON infants on the ELC (t(31) = .36, p = .72, d = 0.13; see Table 2, for each group’s mean and standard deviation for age in days, income index, and Mullen ELC). Stimuli for the eye-tracking and ERP tasks consisted of color photographs of female faces displaying neutral expressions. Each woman was seated in front of a gray background and wearing a gray cloth to cover their clothing. Face images were taken from a database of women who participated in other studies with their infants and signed a release for use of their image in future research.