The monitors did not have any major selleck chemical concerns but detected minor discrepancies/mistakes/omissions e.g. medical officer written the date in Bangla in the consent form, incomplete filling of AGE worksheet and data transfer forms (DTF), trade name of the drug mentioned instead of generic name etc. The data entry

and query resolution for the study were done through PharmaLink web based data entry system. The primary measure of efficacy was severe RVGE [21]. For the evaluation of efficacy of PRV, all participants were followed for efficacy against severe RVGE attending Matlab hospital or community treatment centre at Nayergaon from the time enrollment began until the end of the study. During the study period the field workers contacted 1628 participants at their homes. Among them, 111 mothers reported that they would not be available during

the follow up period, A total of 231 were not included in EPI due to illness or not reported to FSC on vaccination days, 63 mothers Epigenetic Reader Domain inhibitor were not willing to participate when field workers visited their homes, 62 were absent on the vaccination day and 25 received EPI vaccine from outside. The study profile is shown in Fig. 2. A total of 1159 infants were enrolled, and 1136 (98.0%) were randomly assigned to receive three doses of vaccine or placebo. Out of 1136 infants, 1128 (99.3%) received 3 doses of PRV/placebo. Eight infants were discontinued (1 adverse event, 4 physician decision and 3 discontinued by the parents). There were 556 subjects from the vaccine group and 554 subjects from the placebo group that were included in the primary per protocol analysis of efficacy. Among 1136 study participants 584 (51.4%) were male. The mean (SD) age at dose 1,

dose 2 and dose 3 was 8.2 (1.3) weeks, 12.8 (1.5) and 17.4 (1.6) weeks inhibitors respectively. About 99% participants received OPV with each dose of vaccine/placebo (data not shown). For the safety and efficacy follow-up of the study, 12 field workers conducted a total of 26,263 interviews (in person or through PAK6 telephone) (Table 1). Approximately 41 home visits were performed by the field workers per day which included a few telephone contacts. Each field worker covered an area of about 1 km radius and visited 5–6 homes of study participants daily. S/he collected information on AGE and SAEs during the home visits. The duration of the median follow up time among the per-protocol population was 554 days, and the median age of follow up of the participants was 1 year 10.6 months. A total of 1131 (99.6%) children completed follow up by 1 year of age. During the follow up period (712.1 person-years for vaccine group and 692.1 person-years in placebo group), 779 diarrhoea episodes were reported, including 717 at Matlab Hospital and 62 at the Nayergaon Centre (Table 2). Stool samples were collected from 778 (99.9%) AGEs episodes who attended hospital/clinic.