This post-hoc analysis supports the hypothesis that failure to ac

This post-hoc analysis supports the hypothesis that failure to achieve target haemoglobin or hypo-responsiveness to ESA contributes to

poor outcomes. The Correction of Haemoglobin and Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency Trial compared the effect of two haemoglobin target groups (135 g/L vs 113 g/L) on the composite end-point of death, congestive heart failure, stroke and myocardial infarction in 1432 pre-dialysis CKD patients.12 The trial was terminated on the second interim learn more analysis, even though neither the efficacy nor the futility boundaries had been crossed. The composite event rates at median follow up of 16 months were higher in the high haemoglobin group (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.03–1.74). Because the conditional power for demonstrating a benefit for the high haemoglobin group by the scheduled end of the study was less than 5% for all plausible values of the true effect for the remaining data, the trial was stopped early. This excess of primary end-point was predominantly due to death (total 88 events (6%) HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.97–2.27, P = 0.07) and heart failure (total 111 events (8%), 3-deazaneplanocin A HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.97–2.05, P = 0.07). Only 12 patients in each group (1.7%) developed stroke and the risk of stroke was comparable between the two groups (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.45–2.25, P = 0.98). Two post-hoc analyses were performed at 4 and 9 months after randomization comparing high versus low haemoglobin (135 g/L vs 113 g/L)

and high- versus low-dose erythropoietin (≥20 000 U/week vs <20 000 U/week).13 In the 4 months analysis, more patients in the high haemoglobin group failed to achieve target haemoglobin than the low haemoglobin group (37.5% vs 4.7%).

Also, more patients in the high haemoglobin group required high-dose erythropoietin than the low haemoglobin group (35.1% vs 9.6%). Requirement of high-dose erythropoietin among non-achievers was greater in the high haemoglobin group than in the low haemoglobin group (64.2% vs 11.2%). The 9 months analysis showed a similar finding. The initial Cox proportional hazard model demonstrated more harm in the high haemoglobin arm (4 months analysis HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05–1.97 and 9 months analysis HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.09–2.40). In the subsequent models, composite event rates among the high haemoglobin arm were no longer statistically significant when the additional variables of not Avelestat (AZD9668) achieving haemoglobin target and requirement of high-dose ESA were added either alone or together (4 months analysis HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.85–1.71 and 9 months analysis HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.82–2.00). These results indicate that the poor outcomes observed could have been due to either toxicities related to high-dose ESA or patient-level factors underpinning ESA hypo-responsiveness or a combination of both. In the CREATE trial, 603 pre-dialysis CKD patients were randomly assigned to target haemoglobin value in the normal range (130–150 g/L) or the subnormal range (105–115 g/L).

Comments are closed.