During

MI, a black screen was presented instead of animat

During

MI, a black screen was presented instead of animated videos. Auditory cues indicated the start of a new trial (every 2 sec). In addition, participants were asked to close their eyes during MI. They were instructed to focus their attention on their body and to imagine moving specific body parts as required by the task. In other words participants were instructed to use first-person ‘kinesthetic imagery’. In the AO + MI (b) and AO (c) conditions participants watched a video Everolimus in vitro displaying a person performing either the dynamic balance (i) or the static balance (ii) task (Fig. 1). In the AO + MI condition (b), participants were instructed to imagine themselves as the person in the video displayed in a mirror whereas in AO (c) they were instructed simply to watch the video. The person in the video was displayed as a mirror image because it has been proposed that imitation (Koski, Iacoboni, Dubeau, Woods, & Mazziotta, 2003) and observational learning (Higuchi, Holle, Roberts, Eickhoff, & Vogt, 2012) are facilitated by this kind of setup. Participants Pictilisib clinical trial assumed a supine position on the scanner bed and cushions were used to reduce head motion. Visual stimuli were presented on an LCD screen (32″ NNL

LCD Monitor, NordicNeuoLab, Bergen, Norway) with E-Prime 2.0 software (Psychology Software Tools, Inc., www.pstnet.com, PA, USA) at 60 Hz. Participants looked at the screen through a mirror system. The videos were presented with at a visual angle of 17° (vertical plane) and 9° (horizontal plane). The experiments were conducted using a 3T MRI scanner (Discovery MR750; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin USA) at the Fribourg hospital in Switzerland (www.h-fr.ch/). A 32-channel standard head coil was used for acquisition. High resolution T1-weighted anatomical scans were recorded in the coronal plane in an anterior direction (FSPGR BRAVO sequence;

voxel size = .86 × .86 × 1 mm, Abiraterone order number of slices = 220, repetition time (TR) = 7200 msec, echo time (TE) = 2.4 msec, flip angle = 9°). Functional T2*-weighted images were acquired using a Gradient Echo–Echo Planar Imaging (GE-EPI) sequence. The blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast (BOLD) (Kwong et al., 1992) was used as an index of local increases in brain activity. 140 dynamic volumes with axial acquisitions were recorded over the whole brain (voxel size = 1.875 × 1.875 × 3 mm, matrix size = 128 × 128, number of slices = 40; interleaved acquisition from the bottom to the top of the head, interslice spacing = .3, TR = 2500 msec, TE = 30 msec, flip angle = 85°; parallel imaging with an acceleration factor of 2) for each experimental session. In each run functional scanning was preceded by 7.5 sec of dummy scans to ensure steady-state tissue magnetization.

0 (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, USA) Software GPMAW 9 0 (Lightho

0 (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, USA). Software GPMAW 9.0 (Lighthouse Data, Denmark) [66] was used for the theoretical calculations of molecular masses. Sea anemone peptide sequences used for calculation of molecular masses of known toxins were extracted from [63]. Venom maps were constructed by using Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft, USA). The histograms

were constructed with the statistical software Origin 6.0 (Microcal Software, MA, USA). Based on the results obtained in the molecular check details masses measurements of the peptides, as well as the higher abundance of toxins in B. granulifera, we decided to focus our analysis only on the transcriptomics of this species. The total RNA was extracted from tentacles tissues of B. granulifera specimens using the TRIZOL® reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA digestion was performed using DNase I (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). After DNase I treatment, total RNA was purified using RNeasy Mini Spin Column (Qiagen). The quality and quantity of the total RNA were detected using RNA 6000 pico LabChip® kit in Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. Also, the total RNA quantity learn more was measured using Quant-iT™ RNA

BR Assay Kit in Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer. cDNA was synthesized using Roche double-stranded cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Applied Sciences, USA) from total RNA with oligo (dT) 20 primer. A cDNA library was prepared using cDNA rapid library preparation method kit (Roche Applied Science, GS Junior Titanium Series, USA) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Approximately 500 ng of DNA was fractionated into smaller fragments (300–500 4��8C base pairs) that are subsequently polished (blunted) and subjected to adaptor ligation. The optimal amount of cDNA was adjusted to single DNA copy per bead for emulsion PCR (emPCR). Finally, the sequencing was performed in the GS Junior pyrosequencing system (Roche 454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA). EST reads were assembled to contigs by using GS Junior Assembler software. Contigs were mapped to the NCBI non-redundant

databases using MAQ (v0.7.1) [49]. The following softwares were used in the present work: FASTA, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/sss/fasta/[65] for identifying related sequences retrieved from UniProt Knowledgebase; Clustalw2.1, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html[48] for multiple sequence alignment of new peptides and related sequences; Jalview, http://www.jalview.org/[83] for illustrating conserved amino acid; I-TASSER, http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/[70] and [87] for peptide molecular modeling and structure prediction; Deep View Swiss-pdb Viewer 4.0.1, http://www.expasy.org/spdbv/[33] for viewing and calculation of electrostactic potentials of the peptide structures and models and PyMol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.2, 254 Schrödinger, LLC., http://www.pymol.org/) for viewing the structures and models.